ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> InjuryBoard

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: InjuryBoard

Teen's School Strip Search Unconstitutional

By Jane Akre

ADVERTISEMENTS

The strip search by school officials of an Arizona 13-year-old was unconstitutional, the high court ruled today.  
Savana Redding

School Officials Not Liable

LEARN MORE

 

IMAGE SOURCE: Savana Redding/ New York Times Web site 

 

The U.S. Supreme Court has sided with a 13-year-old girl who was strip searched in school against her will.  

Savana Redding's constitutional rights were violated, despite the school's zero tolerance policy toward drugs, the high court ruled in an 8-1 decision.   The justices stopped short of ruling the school shared in any liability.

The ruling takes another step toward defining student rights and school authority in searching out banned contraband such as drugs, alcohol or weapons.

Background

Six years ago, Savana Redding was summoned from her Stafford, Arizona middle school classroom to the principal's office. Someone had accused the teen of carrying prescription strength ibuprofen.  The honor student thought she was being called to the office for accolades. Instead, she was ordered to strip down to her underwear as the school nurse and secretary watched.    

"They just looked at me and said, 'well, now you have to pull out your bra and shake it and your underwear as well," she said to ABC News, her eyes filling with tears. "I really wanted to cry."

Writing for the majority, Justice David Souter wrote "Savana's subjective expectation of privacy against such a search is inherent in her account of it as embarrassing, frightening, and humiliating.Here, the content of the suspicion failed to match the degree of intrusion."

The search was not justified because Savana was not accused of carrying a dangerous weapon, the Court decided.   She had no history of disciplinary issues or drug use.

Dissenting was Justice Clarence Thomas, who argued the search was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which says "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.." 

Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg thought that monetary damages should be awarded and found officials personally liable. 

The only woman on the court, Ginsburg said she doubted her male colleagues could appreciate the embarrassment of a young girl standing before school officials, a situation she called "abusive". 

The girl's mother was never notified. Afterward, students whispered behind her back and thought she was a troublemaker who used pills.  Redding changed schools and then later dropped out of school entirely. 

The Supreme Court heard the argument in April. If it had signed off on strip searches predictions were that you'd see more of them in the future. 

Savana says guidelines are needed on just how far school officials can go. 

"They keep saying that they did it to keep everyone safe. What about me?" Savana said to ABC News. "They didn't keep me safe by doing that."  #

Originally posted at Jane Akre

Full post as published by InjuryBoard on June 25, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)