Personal Injury Law

Captain Crunch Suit Dismissed: Court Finds No "Actual Fruit Referred to as Crunchberry"

By Kenneth Odza

Yes, someone has actually filed a putative class action on the basis that she was 'mislead by the packaging and marketing, which she argues convey the message that the Product contains real, nutritious fruit.' U.S. District Judge England in the Eastern District of California dismissed the complaint captioned as Sugawara v. Pepsico, Inc.

Though Sugawara seems purely frivolous, the claim follows predictably from the Ninth Circuit's decision in Williams v. Gerber discussed previously on this blog. In Williams, the Ninth Circuit reinstated a putative class action that alleged labeling on 'fruit juice snacks' (1) constituted misrepresentation and breach of warranty under California common law and (2) violated California's statutes on unfair competition and consumer law. The district court had granted a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), finding that statements on the label 'were not likely to deceive a reasonable consumer, particularly given that the ingredient list was printed on the side of the box.'

Judge England distinguished Sugawara from Williams, writing that

while the challenged packaging contains the word 'berries' it does so only in
conjunction with the descriptive term 'crunch.' This Court is not aware of, nor has Plaintiff alleged the existence of, any actual fruit referred to as a 'crunchberry.' Furthermore, the 'Crunchberries' depicted on the PDP are round, crunchy, brightly- colored cereal balls, and the PDP clearly states both that the Product contains 'sweetened corn & oat cereal' and that the cereal is 'enlarged to show texture.' Thus, a reasonable consumer would not be deceived into believing that the Product in the instant case contained a fruit that does not exist.

Even lawsuits as unmerited as alleging that consumers believe Crunchberries grow on trees are expensive to deal with. As we said following the Williams decision, the sad state of affairs is that the only way manufacturers can mitigate against these types of putative class actions is to directly involve lawyers in the marketing and labeling process.

Full post as published by Food Liability Law Blog on July 01, 2009 (boomark / email).