ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

Judge Finally Gets Around to Ruling on 26-Year-Old Case

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Recently, District Judge Ronald McPhillips of Toole County, Montana, ruled that James Rubow had not breached his agreement with Milan Ayers, who contended that Rubow owed him millions of dollars for improperly taking his share of a natural-gas field.

This would not be news, except that the lawsuit was filed in March 1983.

You Could Also Get a Color Screen For Just $300 More In March 1983, Ronald Reagan was president, the last episode of "M*A*S*H" had just aired, the "moonwalk" was performed for the first time (the one by Michael Jackson, not Neil Armstrong), and the big hit at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas was Commodore's first portable computer, which offered buyers a full 64 kilobytes of RAM and a five-inch screen for only $995.00.

Also, Ayers v. Rubow was filed.  The last entry in the clerk's register for the case was in March 1985.  After that, the case languished and the court's file on it apparently disappeared.

Time passed.  The Soviet Union fell.  Ronald Reagan died.  Michael Jackson died.  People complained because the battery life of their $299 handheld phone/computer with 64 gigabytes of flash memory was not quite as long as advertised.  One day, Judge McPhillips, who had retired in 1994, was doing some spring cleaning and came across an old case file.  "I think he found it in an old briefcase he had at home," said his former administrative assistant, who was probably quite good but may have let things slip a bit with this particular file.

Judge McPhillips brought the file to the courthouse and asked its current occupant, District Judge Laurie McKinnon, what to do.  She, in turn, asked the Montana Supreme Court what to do.  The high court replied that, if the case was in "good shape," she should let Judge McPhillips go ahead and rule on it.

Was the case in good shape?  Well, it was 26 years old, but luckily Judge McPhillips had taken really good notes.  "He had taken very good, very copious notes on the case," said his assistant, "so it was good he was able to rule on it, and we were able to avoid a new hearing."  Good for Mr. Rubow, at least, who ended up winning.  Judge McPhillips ruled that he had not breached his agreement with Mr. Ayers, and the lawsuit was dismissed.

Ayers said he was not yet sure whether he would appeal.  If he does, he might want to have an explanation ready as to why he forgot about a multi-million-dollar lawsuit he filed in 1983.

Link: AP via Yahoo! News

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on July 13, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.03 secs (new cache)