Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: JURIST - The Paper ChaseSenators conclude Sotomayor questioning
By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.
ADVERTISEMENTS
[JURIST] US Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor reiterated her commitment to applying the law fairly to the facts of each case as members of the US Senate Judiciary Committee concluded their questions Thursday. During questioning from Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Sotomayor said:The role of the courts is to interpret the law as Congress writes it. It may be the effect in a particular situation that, in the court doing that, in giving effect to Congress's intent, it has that outcome, but it's not the role of the judge to create that outcome. It's to interpret what Congress is doing and do what Congress wants.After the Senators concluded their questioning, the committee began hearing testimony from witnesses speaking both for and against Sotomayor's confirmation. One witness who spoke against Sotomayor was Frank Ricci, the named plaintiff in the firefighter racial discrimination case of Ricci v. DeStefano, in which Sotomayor ruled in favor of the city of New Haven. Ricci said:Despite the important civil rights and constitutional claims we raised, the Court of Appeals panel disposed of our case in an unsigned, unpublished summary order that consisted of a single paragraph that mentioned my dyslexia and thus led everybody to think that this case was about me and a disability claim. This case had nothing to do with that. It had everything to do with ensuring our command officers were competent to answer the call and our right to advance in our profession based on merit regardless of race.
Testimony and questioning of the remaining witnesses will continue into Thursday evening.On Wednesday, Sotomayor said that she has rejected personal bias and "ruled according to the law" in abortion-related cases. On Tuesday, she defended her judicial record and emphasized her reliance on precedent when deciding cases. Sotomayor's confirmation hearings began Monday with her saying that she would bring a "fidelity to the law" to the Court in her opening statement, and Senators offering contrasting interpretations of her record in their opening statements. Last week, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary gave Sotomayor a unanimous "well-qualified" rating. In May, Obama praised Sotomayor's experience and wisdom, rebuking Republicans who would oppose her confirmation. Obama warned against partisanship in the confirmation process, saying that he hoped Congress would "avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship" that marked past confirmation hearings. Obama nominated Sotomayor in May to replace retiring Justice David Souter.Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on July 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Schedule for Day 3 of Judge Sotomayor’s Confirmation Hearings
Sotomayor to Begin Visits With Senators Tuesday
Associated Press Using Twitter, Blog to Cover Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings
Sotomayor: A Guests Perspective On What Senators Should Ask The Judge
What questions should Judge Sotomayor be asked in her confirmation hearing
"Sotomayor to meet with senators next week"









