Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectPhony originalism
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
Kevin R. C. Gutzman writing at Taki's Magazine: "Since the days of Ronald Reagan and Edmund Meese, the Republican Party?s position has been that judges should be bound by the people?s understanding of a particular constitutional provision at the time they ratified it. This notion goes under the name 'originalism.' Recent events, including the Republican response to President Obama?s nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, reveal that the party is a highly unreliable vehicle for this principle."Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on August 03, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

How I Cured Rick Hills of Original Intentions Originalism
Koppelman on Originalism & the Establishment Clause
Balkin on Framework Originalism and Skyscraper Originalism
New Symposium on Originalism in NW U. L. Rev.








