Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> North Carolina Estate Planning Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Estate Planning
: North Carolina Estate Planning BlogThe Time for Asset Protection Planning is Now
By Gregory Herman-Giddens
Many people come to see me for asset protection advice only after some type of actual or probable liability has arisen. At that time, it is normally too late to do any meaningful asset protection, as most contemplated transfers of property could be undone as a fraudulent conveyance.
In order to determine whether there has been a fraudulent conveyance, which would render the planning useless, the courts look at "badges of fraud, such as the following:
- An inadequate or fictitious consideration or a false recital as to consideration.
- The fact that property is transferred by a debtor in anticipation of or during a pending suit.
- Transactions which are not in the usual course or method of doing business.
- The giving of an absolute conveyance which is intended only as security.
- The failure to record the conveyance or an unusual delay in recording the payment.
- Secrecy and haste are ordinarily regarded as badges of fraud but are not in themselves conclusive of fraud.
- Insolvency or substantial indebtedness of the grantor.
- The transfer of all the debtor's property, especially when she is insolvent or greatly financially impoverished.
- An excessive effort to clothe a transition with the appearance of fairness.
- The failure of parties charged with fraudulent conveyance to produce available evidence or to testify with sufficient preciseness as to the pertinent details, at least in cases where the circumstances under which the fraud, transfer took place are suspicious.
- The unexplained retention of possession of property transferred by the grantor after conveyance.
- The buyer's employment of the seller to manage the business as before, selling the goods which were the subject of the transfer.
- The failure to examine or to take an inventory of the goods bought or the presence of looseness or incorrectness in determining the value of property.
- The reservations of a trust for the benefit of the grantor and the property conveyed.
- The existence of a blood or other close relationship between the parties to the transfer.
Also, certain other circumstances may constitute evidence of fraud, such as the transferee's failure to keep a record of the dates and amounts of loans, or advances made by him to the transferor; failure to demand repayment; an erroneous or insufficient description of the property transferred; sending the money received from the transferee out of the country; assignment of the property to the seller rather than to the purchaser; and the fact that the purchaser, soon after transfer, offered to resell the property at a much higher price.
Thus, should you have assets you wish to protect, namely real estate, cash and securities, the time to plan is now. The potential for liability already exists, whether it's an automobile accident, failed business deal, defaulted loan, injured tenant, professional malpractice, etc.
Asset protection planning, when properly done, is perfectly legal, and in many cases, is not particularly expensive. However, make sure that you work with an experienced and knowledgeable asset protection attorney - there's too much at stake to do otherwise.
Full post as published by North Carolina Estate Planning Blog on August 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Estate Planning
Documents: durable power of attorney, living will, letter of instruction, and insurance trust
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Recovery One, Cyber Asset, Ascension Recovery - Renovo One LLC
REPOSSESSION DRIVERS - UNPAID OVERTIME
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Hutchinson Oil
Over $75,000 settlement reached in consumer protection lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.

Another Lost Asset Protection Opportunity
When Do It Yourself Asset Protection Goes Wrong
The Connecticut Medicaid Asset Protection Trust
Not A Fraudulent Conveyance To Take Your Name Off Title Of Asset Wholly Paid For By Another Person
Asset Protection Blog....Its great and I hate it
Marty-Nelson: Taxing Offshore Asset Protection Trusts








