ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Kentucky

: Kentucky Cases

Torts - Causes of action relating to reporting to police, immunity under KRS 620.030, bad faith: Morgan v. Bird (COA 5/29/2009)

By Michael Stevens

ADVERTISEMENTS
Morgan v. Bird
2007-CA-001630 05/29/2009 2009 WL 1491301

Opinion by Judge Lambert; Judges Moore and VanMeter concurred.

The Court affirmed an order of the circuit court dismissing appellants? claims brought against a neighbor, a City, members of the city council and a police officer.

The Court held that the trial court properly dismissed the claim for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted, as appellants failed to show that the neighbor acted in bad faith when she reported to the police her suspicion that appellants? toddler son was drinking beer. Therefore, the neighbor was entitled to immunity under KRS 620.030. Further, the one disagreement related to the events did not suggest a level of malice or bad intent required to prove the neighbor acted in bad faith.

The Court further held that it did not matter that the neighbor reported the suspected neglect to her son, a member of a local law enforcement agency, as allowed by the statute.

The Court then held that because there was no bad faith by the neighbor and the officer properly followed the guidelines outlined in the statute for reporting the claim to the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, the claims against the city and city council members for failure to properly supervise and/or train the officer were properly dismissed.

The Court further held that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment on the claim that the officer illegally searched appellants? home. The officer merely followed the Cabinet worker through the home as she conducted her investigation, appellants did not object to the officer entering their home, no property was seized and the officer?s observations had no weight on the Cabinet worker?s decision to place the child with a relative pending drug tests of the parents and a live-in friend.

The Court finally held that appellants? claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress by the police officer was without merit.

Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on September 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0181 secs (new cache)