ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> The Personal Injury Lawyer Directory

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: The Personal Injury Lawyer Directory

Time for a Rewrite?

ADVERTISEMENTS

In 1857, when the Oregon constitution was written, the law claimed that the only way you could recover damages from an assailant was if they injured you, not if they killed you. So, if someone got into a fight over something, it was better to kill the opponent so the attacker didn't have to pay damages. In this way, as the murderer was sitting in prison or getting ready for the hangman's noose, at least he or she could rest assured they wouldn't also have to pay money to the dead person's family. I guess that would be adding insult to injury.

The Modern Day Equivalent

On February 22nd, the Oregon Supreme Court used the law set down in 1857 to cap non-economic damages in a wrongful death case. They claim this is constitutional. A jury awarded a woman $1 million for the death of her daughter caused by medical negligence. Using the constitution, the Court cut those damages in half.

Those who have been clamoring for tort reform for several years will probably look at this case and cheer. It's a victory for them. They claim that limiting what people can recover in cases like this will hold down insurance rates. Yet, Washington, right across the river, has no wrongful death cap, but their insurance rates are similar to those in Oregon.

For anyone paying attention, this isn't the first time an argument like this has wound up in the news. The Bush Administration has been pushing tort reform for years. There are many different scenarios that are bandied about which might fall into this subject. And maybe there are reasons why insurance companies, hospitals, and others, believe caps are valid. But tell that to the family of those who have died. This gets into the realm of deciding your loved one is only worth a certain amount, and no more. Is this going to become the law of the land, written down into state constitutions so that in another 150 years, lawyers, judges, and the average Joe will know just how much everyone is worth? Perhaps.

Until then, if you, or a loved one, believe you are entitled to damages due to a wrongful death, please contact an experienced injury lawyer.

Full post as published by The Personal Injury Lawyer Directory on February 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/03/26 22:06:50)