ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

An Israeli Perspective on U.S. Patent Reform

By Philip Brooks

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Jerusalem Post ran an opinion piece on February 20, 2008 denouncing the Patent Reform Act of 2007.  The article is by Bernard G. Frieder who "served in the cabinet office of the British government as a technology specialist and has advised private firms in the US and the UK. He is currently working with several emerging intellectual-property-based companies in Tel Aviv."  He writes:

The United States Senate is expected to vote soon on legislation, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, which would change America's patent system significantly.

Because inventors, research organizations and startup ventures around the world rely on US patents to protect the output of their labor, changing the US patent system has global repercussions.

Here in Israel especially, US patent reform will have a profound effect.

On a per-capita basis, Israel has the largest number of biotech start-ups and is a world leader in developing revolutionary medical devices. Israeli brainpower is behind "Voice-over Internet Protocol," instant messaging, flash disks, and much more.

US PATENT filings have facilitated and protected these breakthroughs. Specifically, the number of US patent applications filed by Israeli inventors has grown from 632 in 1990 to 3,617 in 2007 - an almost 600-percent increase. In fact, Israelis have more American patents, on a per-capita basis, than the citizens of any other country.

But the changes in US patent law now under consideration by Congress would drastically weaken current protections. This is deeply problematic for Israeli start-ups and suppliers of venture capital, who rely on the US patent system.

THE PROPOSED changes would greatly increase the costs of securing a basic US patent and expand filing requirements and processing time, thereby reducing a patent's term of protection.

Also, a US patent would no longer be a secure asset since its validity could be challenged during the course of its effective life. There would be no closure.

Calculation and allocation of damages would likewise be altered in ways that reduce compensation for those whose patents are violated.

US patent reform is a global issue, and Israelis - individuals, associations, and government alike - ignore the bill's implications at our peril. We should be doing all we can to make US lawmakers aware of our concerns.

Thanks to the reader who alerted me to this article.  Read the full article here.

Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on February 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/04/26 10:42:53)