Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: inversecondemnationFriday Round Up: Dueling NY Eminent Domain Decisions, Rebuilding Beaches
By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The end of a full week in the eminent domain and takings front. The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Florida judicial takings beach case (while the New Jersey and Hawaii courts are considering similar issues), and a New York appellate court issued a blockbuster opinion striking down a taking under Kelo.
- Our commentary about oral arguments in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (cert. granted. June 15, 2009) was broken into three parts. The first covered the arguments of the property owners, then the arguments of the State, and finally the arguments of the federal government as amicus.
- Hat tip to Professor Kanner for pointing out this editorial from the Washington Post: Beachfront property owners deserve justices' support
- BLT: Blog of Legal Times: Behind Justice Stevens' Recusal in Florida Case
- Land Use Prof Blog: Titus' Take on Stop the Beach Oral Arguments
- New Jersey Condemnation Law blog summarizes the New Jersey Supreme Court arguments in a similar case about beach replenishment: Dueling Supreme Courts to Decide Beach Replenishment Takings Issues Heard on Same Day
- From SCOTUSblog: The Court Wades Into Florida Coastal Property Law
- From my Damon Key colleague Mark Murakami's hawaiioceanlaw.com: Do Lines Drawn in the Sand Matter? The Fifth Amendment says...yes
- Charley Foster at Planet Kauai follows up: The many definitions of "shoreline"
- An editorial from the Honolulu Star-Bulletin about the Stop the Beach Renourishment arguments, and a similar case just argued in the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
- The New York Observer: State Court Rules Eminent Domain Use for Columbia West Harlem Campus Unconstitutional
- New York Times: Court Deals a Blow to Columbia's Expansion Plans
- Wall Street Journal Law Blog: Eminent Domain Month Continues: Kelo No Help For Columbia's Plans
- Constitutional Law Prof Blog: New York Court applies Takings Clause against Columbia University's Plans to Expand
Full post as published by inversecondemnation on December 04, 2009 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Eminent Domain
University of Akron pays property owner $443,000 settlement.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.
Downtown Improvement
Springfield to pay more than $2.5 million settlement in eminent domain lawsuit.
Condo Eminent Domain
Maui pays $4.1 million settlement to property owner.
Landfill Eminent Domain
Surry County pays $800,000 settlement to purchase farm land for town dump.
Stadium Eminent Domain
City of Arlington agrees to $2 million Dallas Cowboys stadium settlement.

McFarlane on Eminent Domain and Redevelopment
Panel on Eminent Domain Reform
Hollywood and Eminent Domain Abuse
The Current State of Post-Kelo Eminent Domain Reform
Notice to Commercial Tenants of Eminent Domain Taking







