Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct

Religion & Law

: Constitutionally Correct

Eugene Volokh: ?More on Christian Legal Society v. Martinez?

By ADF Alliance Alert

Eugene Volokh responds once again to David French at the Volokh Conspiracy: "Likewise, it seems to me that there is an eminently conceivable, and legitimate, state interest in denying government funds to groups that discriminate based on religion, sexual orientation, and such, even when the discrimination is ?commonsense? and ?mission-based.? It is reasonable and legitimate for the state to say that public funds, to which taxpayers and students of all religions and sexual orientations contribute, not be spent in any fashion ? even noninvidious fashion ? which subsidizes religious or sexual orientation discrimination." Part VII: French: And Yet Another Response to Professor Volokh Part VI: Volokh: The First Amendment and the Race Discrimination Bogeyman Part V: Volokh: Should access to public university property and funding be treated differently from access to other public property and funding? Part IV: French: Responding to Professor Eugene Volokh (the sequel: CLS v. Martinez) Part III: Volokh: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez and the Court?s University Speech Decisions Part II: French: A Preliminary Response to Professor Volokh Part I: Volokh: No Duty To Subsidize Student Groups? Discriminatory Officer and Member Selection Decisions

Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on December 21, 2009 (boomark / email).