Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Karel's Legal BlogDRAG-ALONG RIGHTS UNDER THE LAWS OF ARUBA
By Karel.Frielink
Drag-along rights may be validly created
On January 1, 2009 the new Aruba Ordinance on companies with limited liability (vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid; VBA) became effective.
A drag-along right is a right that enables a majority shareholder to force a minority shareholder to join in the sale of his shares in a company (VBA). Generally, the majority shareholder doing the dragging must give the minority shareholder the same price, terms, and conditions that apply to him. The question with regards to Aruban law is whether the articles of association of a VBA may contain drag-along provisions.
Article 25(1) of the Ordinance reads basically as follows: the articles of a VBA may provide that, in cases to be precisely described in the articles, the shareholder must offer and transfer his shares to interested parties according to the terms provided in the articles or, for instance, determined pursuant to the articles by independent experts. This provision in the Aruba Ordinance will be triggered if the articles of association provide for a drag-along right. However, this provision will not be triggered if an ordinary shareholders? agreement provides for a drag-along provision.
However, a shareholders? agreement may contain a drag-along provision. Suppose the articles of association make reference to a shareholders? agreement. Would that trigger the statutory provision? No, although the mere fact that the shareholders’ agreement contains a drag-along provision, does not mean that such a provision is in conflict with Article 25(1) of the Ordinance. This is also in line with the general principle of ?freedom?, which governs the Ordinance. The main object of the Aruban legislator was flexibility and maximum freedom of organization and presentation. Accordingly, the Ordinance contains few mandatory provisions, such as provisions relating to the interests of creditors and minority shareholders.
Karel Frielink
Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner
(16 January 2010)
.
Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on January 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.
Hewlett-Packard and Staples
allegedly violated antitrust laws in collaborating on the sale of replacement ink jet printer cartridges.

Drag racer kills co-founder of Steamboat Arabia museum, police say
George Mason U. picks drag queen as homecoming queen
Fatal Drag-Racing Accident in Tennessee
Have they found Natalee Holloway's remains
Homeowner rights while in foreclosure








