Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Writing Blogs -> Writing Tools

Legal Writing

: Writing Tools

Why 'Begs the Question' Doesn't Mean What You Think it Does

By Roy Peter Clark

I took a Logic class my freshman year in college and could not then -- or now -- tell you the difference between a syllogism and a window sill. That confession of logical incompetence begs the question [Editor's note: Roy is about to misuse the phrase "beg the question" and needs a time out.]

My editor is right. Like so many other speakers and writers, I misuse the phrase "beg the question" when I really mean "raise the question."

What's the difference? If you don't already know the answer, there's probably little chance you will ever need to use "begs the question" correctly. So that, if you use the phrase at all, chances are you will use it incorrectly. I guess that means that you should never, ever, ever say or write: "begs the question."

Hmm. That last paragraph is as logical as I usually get, so let me try to do better.

Roy's First Syllogism

It turns out that "begging the question" is a technical term of logic which has been appropriated for countless uses outside of logic. What then is its technical meaning?

There is more than one Web site devoted to correct and incorrect usages of "begging the question." I learned that "begging the question" is a logical fallacy, a form of "circular reasoning" in which the desired conclusion is planted in the premise to be argued.

An example: "That newspaper is biased in favor of liberals because it always leans to the left." In other words, it's biased because it's biased. The bear went over the mountain to see what it could see ... It saw another mountain.

I understand why those in the field of philosophy would not want to lose the technical term to the broader, more common usage. As one warrior on the Beg The Question Web site writes:

Which is not to say that begging the question does not have its charms, as is illustrated by this list of famous sayings by one of my childhood baseball idols Yogi Begger, I mean Yogi Berra:

• "This is like déjà vu all over again."
• "You can observe a lot by watching."
• "He must have made that [movie] before he died."
• "90 percent of the putts that are short don't go in." Which begs, uh, raises the question: What about the other 10 percent?

I heard this exchange on an episode of "Law & Order SVU" in which two detectives kneel over the body of a murder victim:

Begging the question is not the only technical term that has expanded from popular usage, making its use more distracting and confusing than practical. Another is the word "moot," which is often used today to mean "of no practical importance; irrelevant." The word goes back at least to the 16th century and applied to hypothetical cases used by students of law. Three centuries later, the meaning had shifted from "hypothetical" or "academic" to "useless."

A problem arises when the meaning of a word shifts over time, but vestiges of the original meaning remain. That's the case with "begging the question," and it's clearly the case with a point that is declared "moot." Does it mean "subject to debate or argumentation," or does it mean "inconsequential"? In such cases, my inclination is to write what I mean clearly and avoid the ambiguities now inherent in these misused words.

It was easy enough to find more than 700 Google links to the comic misuse "the point is mute," which had nothing to do with your television remote. I could argue that pop singer Rick Springfield drove the final nail in the coffin of "moot" with this lyric from catchy classic "Jessie's Girl":

Perhaps, in this case, "mute" would have been the preferable usage -- and the better rhyme.

Full post as published by Writing Tools on January 20, 2010 (boomark / email).