ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Patently Obvious

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 315: Reexaminations

By Dennis Crouch, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
  • Appealing Reexaminations: PatentLawPic899Rob Sterne has published a 25?page report on ?Appeals from the Central Reexamination Unit.? For the 15 BPAI decisions in inter-partes reexaminations, Stern reports that only 15 inter partes reexaminations have reached a BPAI decision. Of those, the median case took 26.5 months to brief and an additional 6.2 months for the case to be decided. Sterne?s reexamination center provides regular updates on reexamination issues.
  • Reexamination Gridlock: Hal Wegner reports: ?Gridlock at all levels? of the inter partes reexamination process is ?choking inter partes reexamination.?
  • Stays of Litigation: David Donoghue reports on the N.D. Ill case of of Card Activation Techs. V. Bebe Stores, Inc., No. 09 C 406, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 20, 2009) (Gottschall, J.) (case stayed pending reexamination even though the asserted claims were not those being reexamined)
  • Reexamining Design Patents: Scott Daniels writes on his reexamination blog about reexamination of design patents. [Link]  Of the 12 design patent reexaminations requests, two requests were denied based on no SNQ, two patents have been confirmed as properly issued, the other eight are still pending.  Eleven of the twelve requests were submitted by third parties.
  • Webinar on Reexaminations: Managing IP is offering a free webinar on ?Patent Reexamination as a Litigation Strategy? on Feb 24 at 1pm. The talk is led by Novak-Druce attorneys.
  • Reexamination and Litigations: Joe Mullin reports on his Prior Art blog that 60+ photo-sharing defendants may be off-the-hook based on the cancelling of FotoMedia?s patent claims in reexamination. [Link] I looked up the reexamination (No. 90/010,143) and found that the PTO has issued a final rejection about half of the patented claims.
  • Crouch on Reexaminations: I?ll be speaking on reexaminations at the IP Law Summit hosted by the marcus evans company at the Doral resort in Miami Florida March 25?27. See you there.



 

Full post as published by Patently Obvious on January 26, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/03/26 21:47:15)