ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: California Appellate Report

McDermott v. Ampersand Publishing (9th Cir. - Jan. 26, 2010)

By Shaun Martin

ADVERTISEMENTS
I'll have more of substance to say about this case shortly. Which involves a facially narrow labor law issue but which nonetheless is a fairly interesting one (and one which I think will get some play).

But let me ignore the doctrine for a second and simiply give you the pracical bottom line for now:

Don't worry about reading this opinion, which came out this morning. Because it's going to get taken en banc. And reversed.

That's my prediction. If you'd like, read it and see if you agree.

Full post as published by California Appellate Report on January 26, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0034 secs (from cache 11/04/26 00:53:48)