ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Madisonian.net

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Madisonian.net

Intent, Fair Use, and Criminal Copyright Infringement

By Jacqui Lipton

ADVERTISEMENTS

Naturally, I’m still thinking about copyright law in the context of the Twilight franchise – what else would I be doing on a Tuesday morning?  I was looking again at some of the press coverage surrounding the young woman who was detained in custody for several days for making a three minute video-recording in an Illinois movie theater that contained footage from Twilight:  New Moon.  I posted previously about this here and here.  Apparently, she was initially charged with (or at least detained for) criminal copyright infringement.

The woman who had made the recording had said that she had no intention to distribute the recording or to make any commercial profit from it – it was a purely personal record of her sister’s birthday party that included an outing to the theater to see the movie.  I was recently looking at the Nimmer copyright treatise re criminal copyright infringement and noticed a few things I hadn’t picked up on previously, not being an expert in criminal aspects of copyright.  Nimmer notes that there is some debate about whether intent (or “willful conduct”) on the part of the defendant is a requisite aspect of the criminal action and, if so, whether this refers to intent to copy or intent to infringe.  Additionally, Nimmer doesn’t seem to say anything about whether fair use would be a defense to a criminal copyright proceeding.  I’m interested in people’s views on intent and on the potential application of fair use in the criminal copyright context, particularly when considered outside the scope of large scale digital piracy, and within the context of using personal recording devices (eg cellphone cameras) for private purposes.

Nimmer does note that usually an intent to make a commercial profit is required as part of the criminal action, which makes me wonder on what basis the woman in Illinois could really have been subject to criminal liability – and of course she was released from jail after having been detained for two days.  But I don’t know that much about criminal copyright liability and am interested in any light others can shed on the application of the legal principles relating to criminal copyright law to personal video-taping in movie theaters.

No Tags

Full post as published by Madisonian.net on January 26, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0138 secs (new cache)