Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawU.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals holds that employer may discipline union rep for attempted bribery of witness at hearing
Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs/
Reproduced with permission. Copyright © 2009, Mitchell H. Rubinstein, Esq., Adjunct Professor of Law, St. Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.
The 2d Circuit issued a very important RLA case that has implications for the broader field of labor arbitration. A special adjustment board complied with the Railway Labor Act (RLA) and acted within the scope of its jurisdiction under the Act when it held that Amtrak was permitted to discipline an employee for conduct that occurred while he was functioning as a union representative.
While representing a union member at a disciplinary hearing, the employee allegedly attempted to bribe a witness. The adjustment board found the employee guilty as charged; however, a federal district court vacated the board's decision, finding that the RLA did not provide employers with any say over the conduct of the employees' representative while the representative is engaged in his or her representative capacity.
The Second Circuit observed that the "federal courts do not sit as super arbitration tribunals in suits brought to enforce awards of the adjustment board, so they may not substitute their judgments for those of the board." In this instance, the circuit court found no support for the district court's conclusion that the RLA created an unassailable "cloak of immunity" for the misconduct of railroad employees functioning in a representative capacity. Such a doctrine would have a deleterious effect on the "time-tested disciplinary process" through which railroad labor disputes are resolved. United Transp Union v National RR Passenger Corp (Amtrak,___F.3d___(2d Cir. December 9, 2009).
Mitchell H. Rubinstein
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on February 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Gay Marriage Laws
Where same sex couples can marry
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Restaurant Staff
Win Lawsuit Suit Against Employer for Infiltrating their MySpace Forum
Siemans
Agrees $1.3 Billion Settlement for International Bribery Charges
Windows Software
Microsoft fined $1.3 billion for failing to comply with the European Union's antitrust order.
Employment
Employee rights including labor law, harassment, safety, unpaid overtime, discrimination and union disputes.

2ndCir: Amtrak may discipline union rep for attempted bribery of witness at hearing
SC: Witness bribery requires disbarment
Wilkes released during appeal to bribery conviction
Breaking News! 3rd Holds That Employer Cannot Discriminate Against Woman Because She Had An Abortion
NLRB Holds No duty to reassure employees about former union organizer on staff
Ex-state AG says beware of targeting








