Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Primus on Friedman on Public Opinion & Constitutional Interpretation

By Lawrence Solum

Richard Primus (University of Michigan Law School) has posted Public Consensus as Constitutional Authority (George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Barry Friedman's new book "The Will of the People" attempts to dissolve constitutional law's countermajoritarian difficulty by showing that in practice the Supreme Court does only what the public will tolerate. His account succeeds if "the countermajoritarian difficulty" refers to the threat that courts will run the country in ways that contravene majority preference but not if the "the countermajoritarian difficulty" is the name of the need to explain the legitimate sources of judicial authority in those cases where decision do contravene majority preference. Friedman's book does not pursue the second possibility and may suggest that doing so is unimportant, in part because of the limited latitude that public opinion gives the Court and in part because of skepticism about the enterprise of constitutional interpretation. This essay argues that Supreme Court decisionmaking is important despite being constrained by public opinion and that the constraint of public opinion should sometimes be understood as an aspect of constitutional interpretation rather than as an alternative to it. Public opinion that approaches consensus is better understood as a contributing factor in the calculus of arriving at correct constitutional outcomes than as a force demonstrating the limits (or impossibility) of authentic constitutional interpretation.

I always learn from Primus--recommended with enthusiasm.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on February 10, 2010 (boomark / email).