ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: IPBiz

The significance of current patent reform efforts

By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
In an article titled Time growing short for patent reform, DOUG SHERWIN manages to entirely miss the boat on the latest round of patent reform.

Of the text

He [Rosenberg] said the current provisions in the bill are focused on litigation reform.

IPBiz notes that once Arlen Specter walked, there has been no "focus" on litigation reform in the patent reform bill. It's status quo.

The current focus is in tinkering with procedural remedies, specifically altering some aspects of re-exam.

Sherwin did NOT talk about fee diversion. In contrast, Gary Griswold of the Coalition for 21st Century Patent Reform got to the point:

The Coalition for 21st Century Patent Reform appreciates the work and effort by Chairman Leahy and Ranking Member Sessions, along with that of Senators Hatch, Kyl, Feinstein, Specter and other Judiciary Committee members, to reach a compromise agreement on patent reform legislation. Our coalition of nearly 50 companies from diverse industry sectors has been actively supporting fair and balanced patent reform for several years. We believe the compromise agreement, coupled with the USPTO being able to retain and use all of its fees, would achieve that goal.

The IAM blog wrote on 26 Feb. 2010: Let's not forget that a couple of months ago, the legislature voted for what was essentially a cut in the USPTO's budget, at a time when it desperately needed (and still needs) support. It seems to me that unless the topic of the office's funding is properly addressed, any other measures that might be agreed are going to be pretty worthless. In any case, I came to the conclusion a long time ago that legislative patent reform in the US is not going to happen for a while yet. Right now, I see no reason to change that view.

IPBiz had written on 25 Feb. 2010: Unless the fee diversion is tackled, this is not the real deal. "it's a joke, son."

Full post as published by IPBiz on March 02, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/02/26 19:51:18)