ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Union can require non-members to contribute to union?s legal fees

ADVERTISEMENTS
Union can require non-members to contribute to union?s legal fees
Locke et al. v. Karass, State Controller, et al. 200 U. S. 321

The Supreme Court decided that a public employees' union may require individuals in the negotiating unit who are not union members to pay a share of the legal fees incurred in a national lawsuit.*

The Maine State Employees Union contended that individuals not electing to join the union still must pay ?agency shop fees?** to the union if they are covered by collective bargaining agreement negotiated by the union and its costs in participating in a national lawsuit were properly included as an element of the local?s agency shop fee.

The nonmembers argued that requiring them to share in the costs the local incurred in litigating an issue in a ?national? lawsuit was similar to charging them for the costs incurred by the local in its political activities and lobbying efforts. Unions are required to repay its nonmembers the prorata cost of political and lobbying activities that are included in the agency shop fee charged its non-members. The Supreme Court decided that the local?s national litigation costs was not such a forbidden charge.

In the words of the court, ?? the national litigation expenses before us are both appropriately related to collective bargaining and reciprocal. Consequently, consistent with our precedent, those expenses are chargeable.?

* In contrast, in Kidwell v Transportation Communications Union, 946 F.2d. 283, the Circuit Court held that a union member employed in an agency shop does not have any right to object to his or her union's using part of a member's dues for activities unrelated to collective negotiations.

**
Chapter 338 of the Laws of 2008 made the agency shop fee provisions for public employees setout in the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14] permanent for State employees and employees of political subdivisions of the State. Prior the enactment of Chapter 338, statutory authorizations for such fees were subject to a "sunset" provision and had to be reenacted periodically.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on March 09, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.004 secs (from cache 11/06/26 03:56:32)