Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogSubstantive Unreasonableness Argument Rejected
By Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
US v. Chavez-Suarez, -- F.3d --, 2010 WL 761077 (10th Cir. 3/8/10) - Although the court expresses some sympathy for the substantive unreasonableness argument that the 16-level enhancement for reentry after deportation following an 11-year-old marijuana conviction resulted in an unfairly long sentence in light of the "relatively benign nature" and staleness of the marijuana conviction, the district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting the argument. The court characterizes as "singularly unpersuasive" the government's argument to the district court that "drug trafficking is as serious as murders or child molestation or other serious types of felonies . . . even if it's a small amount [that] might not look horrendous."Full post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on March 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Merger Agreement Rejected
Finish Line and Genesco reach $175 million settlement in merger dispute.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Sixth Circuit splits on the substantive unreasonableness of probation sentence in fraud case
Close To The Line Of Procedural Unreasonableness
Tenth Circuit questions illegal reentry guideline while rejecting substantive unreasonableness claim
Note To Appellate Lawyers: Getting Away From An Appeal Waiver
Whisenant: No Actual Bias of Judge







