Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerTwo votes for review in Davis v. FMCC
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
Which, unfortunately, is not enough. Yesterday the Supreme Court denied the petition for review in Davis v. Ford Motor Credit Co., no. S179049. Justices Kennard and Werdegar voted to grant review.
We'll have to go a little longer without knowing what "unfair" means in consumer cases. Here is my original post on the Court of Appeal's opinion in Davis.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on March 11, 2010 (boomark / email).
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review

Ford Motor Credit Company Repossession Class Action Settlement
Recording Board Votes - Is It Required
No Supreme Court Review for Troy Davis
Upcoming Symposium on Justice Stevens
Davis Polk Releases Comprehensive Review of Financial Crisis Laws
Pittsburgh officer kills her attacker during fight for life








