Class Action

More materials from Weinstat v. Dentsply

By Kimberly A. Kralowec

Here are more materials from Weinstat v. Dentsply, no. S180179:

• Letter Supporting Review of American Honda Motor Co. (dated 03/12/10)
• Reply to Answer to Petition for Review (filed 03/12/10)
• Letter Supporting Review of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce et al. (dated 03/18/10)

The reply brief (at p. 2) cites this blog and this blog post in particular.  That's the post where I listed the nine post-Tobacco II decisions handed down to date. 

As the reply brief notes, I did say that the opinions were difficult to reconcile, but I did not say it was impossible.  And while I appreciate being described to the Supreme Court as a "prominent UCL commentator," I do not support the petition for review in Weinstat.   

Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on March 23, 2010 (boomark / email).