ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> ACS Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: ACS Blog

Bush Vetos Bill Banning Harsh Interrogation Techniques and Requiring Reports to Congress

ADVERTISEMENTS

In his weekly radio address on Saturday morning, President Bush announced his veto of an intelligence authorization bill, H.R. 2082 (PDF), citing its limits on the CIA's interrogation methods. (The relevant sections are 326 and 327).

The Congressional Research Service, in this report on Interrogation of Detainees, summarized the legislation as related to interrogation as follows (emphasis added):

H.R. 2082 . . . would generally bar any person, in the custody or effective control of either an element of the intelligence community or a contractor or subcontractor of the intelligence community, from being subjected to any treatment or interrogation tactic not authorized by the Army Field Manual.

This prohibition would effectively bar the CIA and others from employing certain controversial interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding or sleep deprivation, that are barred by the Army Field Manual, regardless of whether the intelligence community had previously deemed such techniques as legally permissible. H.R. 2082 would not prohibit the Army Field Manual from being revised in the future, meaning that the scope of prohibited conduct could potentially be modified.

H.R. 2082 also contains a provision requiring the Director of National Intelligence to report to appropriate committees concerning detention or interrogation methods approved or discontinued following enactment of the McCain Amendment and MCA, along with the legal basis behind the decision to approve or rescind authorization of such techniques.

The Army Field Manual on Human Intelligence Collector Operations bans the use of torture. It explains (page 5-21):

Use of torture is not only illegal but also it is a poor technique that yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say what he thinks the HUMINT collector wants to hear. Use of torture can also have many possible negative consequences at national and international levels.


The manual specifically bans:

5-75. If used in conjunction with intelligence interrogations, prohibited actions include, but are not limited to—
• Forcing the detainee to be naked, perform sexual acts, or pose in a sexual manner.
• Placing hoods or sacks over the head of a detainee; using duct tape over the eyes.
• Applying beatings, electric shock, burns, or other forms of physical pain.
• “Waterboarding.”
• Using military working dogs.
• Inducing hypothermia or heat injury.
• Conducting mock executions.
• Depriving the detainee of necessary food, water, or medical care.

UPDATE: Additional resources

Full post as published by ACS Blog on March 08, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/05/26 08:57:28)