ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: How Appealing

"[I]n the past dozen years or so, has become the fashion -- moving from the exceptional to the normal -- of our Court for some judges, who were not on the pertinent panel, to file dissents regularly when en banc rehearing is denied."

ADVERTISEMENTS
"[I]n the past dozen years or so, has become the fashion -- moving from the exceptional to the normal -- of our Court for some judges, who were not on the pertinent panel, to file dissents regularly when en banc rehearing is denied." So observed Circuit Judge J.L. Edmondson in an opinion concurring in an order denying rehearing en banc that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued yesterday.

Full post as published by How Appealing on April 15, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0133 secs (new cache)