Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomCritics of Access and Congressional Action: The Boomerang Effect
By J Robert Brown Jr.
As Congress moves forward on financial reform, one things seems certain. The SEC will get the rulemaking authority to allow shareholders access to the company's proxy statement for their nominees.
It is clear that this is the result of critics of access, particularly those that threatened to challenge the SEC's rulemaking authority in the area. Few were as strident on the issue as the Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber all but threatened to sue the agency if it adopted the rule. See Update On Shareholder Access, Shareholder Bill Of Rights And Other Washington Efforts On Corporate Governance, Thomas Quaadman, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Oct. 4, 2009 ("This is the third time in six years that the SEC is considering implementing shareholder access. While previous efforts have failed, this comment period has proven to be no less controversial. Proponents of shareholder access are quietly confident that the third time is the charm, however, history and potential legal challenges may prove them wrong.").
The challenge to rulemaking was never very strong. It mostly arose out of the DC Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable that struck down the SEC's attempt to impose one-share, one-vote, on the stock exchanges. Access, in contrast, merely involved disclosure, something well within the SEC's authority.
Nonetheless, the threats likely contributed to the decision of Congress to include access in the financial reform process. Once adopted, the litigation threat will disappear. More to the point, the legislation will allow the Agency to be more decisive in the exercise of its authority. Had authority been unclear, even marginally, the Commission might have taken an approach to the rule that was designed to reduce the risk of legal challenge. This might have resulted in higher ownership thresholds or longer time limits, making access less useful.
Congress is about to take away the litigation risk. Critics of access are to be thanked for the development.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on May 29, 2010 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Getty Images
Faces Class Action over Premium Access
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
Disability Access
Developers pay $175,000 settlement for failing to comply with the Fair Housing Act.
Access Roads
Developer Bob Honts agrees to $250,000 property development settlement.
Suit Filed On Behalf of 400,000 Michigan Medicaid-Dependents Denied Access to Dental Healthcare
Michigan Medicaid Sued Over Dental Healthcare

Problems with PACER - public must still pay for public domain dox
GPO Access Now Offers Authenticated Congressional Bills
Authenticated Congressional Bills now live on GPO Access
More Documents Now Available on FDsys








