ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: SCOTUSBLOG

More Solicitor General invitation briefs

By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Solicitor General’s office filed three more invited amicus briefs yesterday, in Triple-S Management Corporation v. Municipal Revenue Collection Center, Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc., and Pfizer, Inc. v. Abdullahi.  All three straightforwardly recommend denials.

The amicus brief in Triple-S Management Corporation v. Municipal Revenue Collection Center (09-233) recommends a denial.

  • Questions presented: (1) Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review a decision of the Puerto Rico Court of Appeals that the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico declined to review (as it did in this case) and (2) whether the Municipal Revenue Collection Center violated the Due Process Clause by retroactively revoking a property-tax exemption that it had recognized in administrative letter rulings issued to the petitioners.
  • All of the cert. papers are available on the case’s SCOTUSwiki page, here.

The amicus brief in Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc. (09-683) recommends a denial.

  • Question presented: Whether a private military contractor in Iraq should be afforded de facto immunity under the political question doctrine for severely injuring a U.S. soldier in an automobile wreck during a routine convoy.
  • All of the cert. papers are available here.

The amicus brief in Pfizer, Inc. v. Abdullahi (09-34) recommends a denial.

  • Question presented: Whether Alien Tort Statute (ATS) jurisdiction can extend to a private actor based on alleged state action by a foreign government when there is no allegation that the government knew of or participated in the specific acts by the private actor claimed to have violated international law. Whether, absent state action, a complaint that a private actor has conducted a clinical trial of a medication without adequately informed consent can surmount the ?high bar to new private causes of action? under the ATS.
  • All of the cert. papers are available here.

Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on May 30, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)