Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally Correct?David Souter vs. the Antonin Scalias?
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
E.J. Dionne Jr. writing in the Washington Post: "In a remarkable speech that received far too little attention, former Supreme Court justice David Souter took direct aim at the conservatives' favorite theory of judging. Souter's verdict: It 'has only a tenuous connection to reality.' At issue is 'originalism,' an approach to reading the Constitution whose seeming precision has given conservatives a polemical advantage over the liberals' 'living Constitution' idea that appears to let judges say our founding document means whatever they want it to mean." | Via How Appealing.Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on June 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
David Hasselhoff Divorce
Baywatch star reaches settlement in family lawsuit.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

"David Souter vs. the Antonin Scalias"
David Souter, Human Rights Justice
More on Justice Souter: Nothing Like What Anyone Expected








