Academic

MICHAEL BARONE: THEY DON?T LIKE THE DOG FOOD: William Galston, than whom there is no better thin?

By Glenn Reynolds

MICHAEL BARONE: THEY DON’T LIKE THE DOG FOOD:

William Galston, than whom there is no better thinker among Democrats today, has been reading the same polls as his Brookings colleague E. J. Dionne, but takes a much harsher view of what Democrats can do. ?In a blogpost on The New Republic website headlined ?Prepare yourself for Speaker Boehner,? Galston tell House Democrats ?it?s time to press the panic button,? and cites the analysis of political scientist Alan Abramowitz on Larry Sabato?s website and the analysis by Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg of the poll he and Republican pollster Glenn Bolger conducted for NPR. Here?s Galston?s advice for House Democrats: ?

Democrats must face the fact that much of the legislation that seems both necessary and proper to them looks quite different to the portion of the electorate that holds the balance of political power. And they must face a choice as well?between (to be blunt) the politics of conviction and the politics of self-preservation. . . . It reminds me of the old story about the advertising agency and the dog food. The best ads in the world failed to increase sales of the dog food. So they sent a market researcher in and found the reason: The dogs didn?t like the dog food. The Democrats? problem is similar. The American people don?t like the dog food (?legislation that seems both necessary and proper to them?) produced by the Obama Democrats

Read the whole thing.

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on June 19, 2010 (boomark / email).