Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Ninomania

Constitutional Law

: Ninomania

By David M. Wagner

In part IV, the Court seems to be saying: the test for vagueness is more sensitive when speech and expressive association are concerned; but it does not follow that speech and expressive association are a "third rail" such that any otherwise-valid law that touches them become per-se void for vagueness. That would collapse a great deal of otherwise-valid democratic lawmaking into bans on speech;

Full post as published by Ninomania on June 21, 2010 (boomark / email).