Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Legal Pad | LA
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Legal Pad | LAQuon and electronic workplace privacy explained by Rutan & Tucker attorneys
By Richard Binder
Last week an article by Jeffrey Wertheimer and Brandon Sylvia of Rutan & Tucker LLP ran in the OC Register explaining the Supreme Court's recent decision in City of Ontario v. Quon and how it affects workers in private companies. The gist for employees, perhaps unsurprisingly, is "always assume that your boss can and will monitor all communications sent from a company device," but for employers things get a little dicier. Check it out here.
Wertheimer is a partner in the firm's Employment and Labor Department, and Sylvia is an associate in the same department.
Full post as published by Legal Pad | LA on June 24, 2010 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Jury Awards $1,642,475 in Workplace Electrocution Lawsuit
Workplace Electrocution Lawsuit Jury Awards $1,642,475
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation

Supreme Court Review of Quon May Provide Important Guidance for Private Employers
SCOTUS grants cert in privacy in work text massages case: City of Ontario v. Quon
Was the Stored Communications Act Actually Violated in City of Ontario v. Quon
Faculty Blogs: Checklist of Workplace Privacy Laws
EFF Urges Supreme Court to Protect Text-Message Privacy
Supremes Grant Cert In Major Employee Privacy Case









