Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Althouse
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: AlthouseTom Goldstein predicts the outcomes (and the authors) of the final 4 Supreme Court cases of this Term.
1. Bilski v. Kappos:
The only Justice who has not issued a majority opinion from [the November] sitting is Justice Stevens, which makes him the very likely author. Justice Stevens tends to take a narrow view of patent rights...2. Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board:
I ultimately predict that the Bilski majority opinion will be authored by Justice Stevens and that the decision will be very significant in its narrowing of the scope of method patents.
[N]either the Chief Justice nor Justice Kennedy has authored an opinion from [the December] sitting... [but] Chief is ... unlikely to leave himself without an opinion in a sitting.3. McDonald v. City of Chicago:
If I?m right, that means that the PCAOB?s structure is likely to be invalidated as unconstitutional. At oral argument the Chief Justice asked no questions of counsel to the plaintiffs and was hostile to the defense of the statute....
[T]he only Justice not to write from [the February] sitting is Justice Alito....4. Christian Legal Society v. Martinez:
I predict that Justice Alito will write the Court?s opinion in McDonald recognizing that the Second Amendment is incorporated [in the 14th Amendment and thus applicable to state and local government]....
Neither Justice Stevens nor Justice Ginsburg authored an opinion from [the April] sitting....We shall see. It's a big Supreme Court day tomorrow. The Court's Term ends, with the retirement of Justice Stevens, and the hearings on the Kagan nomination begin.
Though it is very difficult to tell, I think that the most likely outcome in these circumstances is that Justice Ginsburg will issue a majority opinion in favor of Hastings Law School on the relatively narrow basis that the plaintiffs stipulated that the school had a neutral ?all comers? policy that did not discriminate against this group but instead provided that all groups must accept all students
Full post as published by Althouse on June 27, 2010 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Pesticides
Long-Term Exposure Linked to Diabetes
Long-Term Insurance Suit
Settled for $15 Million
Salmonella Found in Tomotoes
57 Reported Cases in New Mexico and Texas
ConAgra Peanut Butter
Hundreds of Salmonella Cases Settled
UnumProvident
for allegedly denying long-term disability claims.

"Final Arguments of Supreme Court Term Filled With Big Cases"
Is Justice Thomas "Now Our Greatest Justice"
Supreme Court to hear prosecutor immunity, EPA regulation cases
Public Citizen Releases Statistical Survey of Public Interest Cases in the Latest Supreme Court Term







