Home -> Law Blog Directory -> New Law Blogs Blogs -> Texas Supreme Court in the News
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
New Law Blogs
: Texas Supreme Court in the NewsTexas Supreme Court: Cattle Rustling Justifies Punitive Damages ... But Amount is Constitutionally Excessive (Appellate Strategist)
By DocketDB
Full post as published by Texas Supreme Court in the News on July 01, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Texas Employment Law
alleged violations of Texas labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Excessive Bank Overdraft Fees
Bank Overdraft Fees alleging excessive fees and misrepresentation of account balances and more.
Oscar Winner Sues Production Company
Ascendant pays Kevin Costner undisclosed amount in settlement.
City of Fargo To Pay for Excessive Traffic Fines
City of Fargo To Pay for Excessive Traffic Fines
Environment Law
alleging damages from violation of the law.
AT&T Faces Class Action over Excessive Data Usage Charges
AT&T Faces Class Action over Excessive Data Usage Charges

Cattle rustling and exemplary damages [Jun. 25, 2010]
Punitive Damages Verdict Against Broadcaster Affirmed; Court Uses Two-Pronged Standard Of Review
"Oregon Supreme Court rules punitive damages excessive"
Supreme Court Reduces Exxon Valdez Punitives to $500M
Oregon Supreme Court takes away $100 million in punitive damages due to flawed jury instruction








