ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Administrative Law Blogs -> LibraryLaw Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Administrative Law

: LibraryLaw Blog

New Jersey ACLU open records requests show book removal decisions history

By Mary

ADVERTISEMENTS

The New Jersey ACLU filed an open records request and uncovered some email documents at libraries that have removed Revolutionary Voices from their shelves.

An active censorship campaign is underway in New Jersey, to remove a book entitled Revolutionary Voices, edited by Amy Sonnie, an anthology of literature and art recommended by GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational Alliance. A conservative group told the Philadelphia Inquirer l that the book, which contains some sexually explicit material, is "pervasively vulgar, obscene, and inappropriate.?

The book has been removed from two libraries. The Rancocas Valley Regional High School received a formal challenge, convened a review committee pursuant to its established policies, and voted to take the book off its shelves.  The challenge at the high school attracted international attention. http://www.torontosun.com/news/world/2010/05/10/13897071.html, and the local chapter of the ACLU investigated.

The ACLU found that a public library had also received an informal complaint from the same individual, that staff recommended removal, and that the library commission also voted to remove the title. In contrast, the library did not appear to follow its own policies for handling challenges of controversial materials. The open records documents (see below) show that the reasoning for taking the book off the shelves is because it is "child pornography."

The ACLU has asked other regional libraries whether they have similarly removed the volume from their collections and, if so, whether they followed their deselection policies. A second school library is missing the title, and at present is not replacing it.

The take-home message for libraries, especially public institutions, is that book removal policies are immensely important. Libraries can protect themselves against exposure to lawsuits, if they adopt procedures for handling challenges http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/challengeslibrarymaterials/copingwithchallenges/conductingchallenge/index.cfm and for "weeding," -- and then exercise care to follow those procedures carefully.

Thank you to ACLU-NJ for Open Records documents.

OPEN RECORDS REQUEST DOCUMENTS:

Press coverage of School #1 and background including LibraryLaw interview with author

Public Library emails - removal of book

Public Library Controversial Materials policy 

School #2 correspondence - missing copy


Full post as published by LibraryLaw Blog on July 23, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/01/26 01:51:43)