Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> ThePopTort
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: ThePopTortThe Michigan Supreme Court?s Peaceful Revolt
By Joe Consumer
Rodney McCormick, a Flint-area GM employee, ?had sought
damages for pain and suffering after he was run over by a loading truck while
on the job and missed 19 months of work." Seems like a no-brainer, but
unfortunately in 2004, when the court was the most consumer unfriendly,
anti-environment, anti-victim, precedent-disregarding court in the land, it
ruled in the Kreiner v. Fischer case
that only ?permanently? harmed people were entitled to this type of
compensation, reversing law that had been in effect basically since the 1960s
when Michigan?s no-fault law passed.
But yesterday, Mr. McCormick won his case, with the court
saying the Kreiner decision ?required a ?strained? reading of the statute that
resulted in more restrictions on lawsuits than the Legislature intended or
enacted.?
As one attorney put it,
under the earlier 2004 Kreiner decision, ?pain doesn?t matter. ?Periods of near total
incapacitation and recuperation after surgery do not make a difference. An
entire year off of work and of being physically unable to enjoy the activities
that are most important to a person ? are not enough? to meet the law's threshold.? As a result, ?Kreiner has resulted in
the dismissal of 79 percent of car accident victims' lawsuits. And since
Kreiner was decided, there have been 250 unpublished appellate decisions,
revealing only 51 cases in favor of auto accident victims; and a staggering 198
cases in favor of auto insurance company defendants, according to Michigan
Lawyers Weekly.?
The Detroit Free Press wrote, "The McCormick decision immensely pleased one formerly injured motorist. Richard
Kreiner, of Attica, became synonymous in Lansing with the higher threshold for
pain and suffering damages when he lost in the 2004 case. Kreiner said even
today, 15 years after his accident, he still has back pain and can?t work at
his construction job as much as he once did. ?I?m glad that some good came out of it ? even if it doesn?t
help me,? he said.?
Full post as published by ThePopTort on August 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Michigan Employment Law
alleged violations of Michigan labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Suit Filed On Behalf of 400,000 Michigan Medicaid-Dependents Denied Access to Dental Healthcare
Michigan Medicaid Sued Over Dental Healthcare
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tyco
Settles with Michigan State for $24.5 Million
Michigan State
Settles Class Action Over Child Welfare

Courts - "Negative ad rolled out in Michigan Supreme Court race"
The Michigan Litigation Process - Appeals
Michigan Supreme Court hears case today on ballot measure
"New Michigan Supreme Court rules may be unconstitutional"
"Michigan Supreme Court rules against Fieger"
Michigan Supreme Court nixes court depacking scheme







