Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawRemanding an arbitration award for the sole purpose of calculating or recalculating "damages" does not permit a new determination on the merits
Shroid Construction v Dattoma, App Div, 250 AD2d 590
Sometimes an arbitration award is challenged pursuant to Article 75 and while sustained on the merits, the matter is remanded to calculate or recalculate the amount of ?damages? to be paid. May the arbitrator make new or additional findings in calculating the ?damages? to be paid?
In the Shroid case, the Appellate Division ruled that the answer is no: ?under the circumstances, it was improper for the [hearing officer] to attempt to amend his findings after they had been reviewed and affirmed on appeal.?
Shroid alleged the union had sanctioned a work slowdown by its members in violation of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. The Judicial Hearing Officer [JHO] who heard the complaint ultimately sustained the allegations and ruled that the union?s action violated the contract, which resulted in Shroid?s suffering ?actual damages.?
The JHO?s determination was sustained by the Appellate Division and the matter was returned to him for a determination of amount of the damages Shroid suffered. However, while considering the question of damages, the JHO made ?substantive changes? in his findings and Shroid again appealed.
Shroid argued that the JHO did not have any power to make a substantive change in his findings, particularly in the light of the Appellate Division?s determination sustaining his findings.
The Appellate Division agreed. According to the ruling, the JHO?s authority was limited to making a ?calculation of damages? resulting from the work slowdown.
The Appellate Division commented that its ruling in a prior appeal is not only binding on the parties, but was binding ?on this court as well.?
In other words, once an arbitration award is sustained by the court, that determination is binding on the parties, and on the courts, in any future litigation involving a challenge to that determination.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on August 05, 2010 (boomark / email).
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Damaged Billboards
Lamar Advertising pays $35,000 settlement after violating permit laws.
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Environment Law
alleging damages from violation of the law.
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Failure-to-accommodate claim yields $1.82M award
$1.82 Million Awarded in Employment Lawsuit

CA1: Arbitration award vacated
Chancery Applies FINRA Rules To Affirm Arbitration Award with Punitive Damages
4thCir: Court vacates financial advisors' NASD arbitration award
Moral Damages Awarded in International Arbitration









