Podcasts

Communications Decency Act immunizes hosting provider from defamation liability

Johnson v. Arden, — F.3d —, 2010 WL 3023660 (8th Cir. August 4, 2010)

The Johnsons sell exotic cats. They filed a defamation lawsuit after discovering that some other cat-fanciers said mean things about them on Complaintsboard.com. Among the defendants was the company that hosted Complaintsboard.com ? InMotion Hosting.

The district court dismissed the case against the hosting company, finding that the Communications Decency Act at 47 U.S.C. §230 (?Section 230?) immunized the hosting provider from liability. The Johnsons sought review with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. On appeal, the court affirmed the dismissal.

Though Section 230 immunity has been around since 1996, this was the first time the Eighth Circuit had been presented with the question.

Section 230 provides, in relevant part, that ?[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.? It also says that ?[n]o cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.?

The Johnsons argued that Section 230 did not immunize the hosting company. Instead, they argued, it did just what it says ? provides that a party in the position of the hosting company should not be treated as a publisher or speaker of information provided by third parties. The Johnsons argued that the host should be liable in this case regardless of Section 230, because under Missouri law, defendants can be jointly liable when they commit a wrong by concert of action and with common intent and purpose.

The court rejected the Johnsons? argument, holding that Section 230 bars plaintiffs from making providers legally responsible for information that third parties created and developed. Adopting the Fourth Circuit?s holding in Nemet Chevrolet v. Consumeraffiars.com, the court held that ?Congress thus established a general rule that providers of interactive computer services are liable only for speech that is properly attributable to them.?

No evidence in the record showed how the offending posts could be attributed to the hosting provider. It was undisputed that the host did not originate the material that the Johnsons deemed damaging.

Given this failure to show the content originated with the provider, the court found in favor of robust immunity, joining with the majority of other federal circuits that have addressed intermediary liability in the context of Section 230.

Full post as published by InternetCases.com on August 06, 2010 (boomark / email).