Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawIn a law enforcement environment, safety interests trump sincere religious beliefs
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v The GEO Group, Inc., USCA 3rd Circuit, No. 09-3093
GEO, a private company, contracted to run the George W. Hill Correctional Facility, the prison for Delaware County, Pennsylvania.
In April 2005, the Hill Facility instituted a dress policy that provided that ?[n]o hats or caps will be permitted to be worn in the facility unless issued with the uniform.? The new policy also stated that ?[s]carves and hooded jackets or sweatshirts will not be permitted past the Front Security Desk.?
These directives were interpreted to prohibit the wearing of a khimar, an ?Islamic religious head scarf, designed to cover the hair, forehead, sides of the neck, shoulders, and chest,? which was until then worn by some female Muslim employees inside of the Hill Facility.
EEOC filed a lawsuit on behalf of a class of Muslim women employees against GEO, contending that GEO violated Title VII's prohibitions on religious discrimination when it failed to accommodate the Muslim female employees by providing them an exception to the prison's dress policy that prevented them from wearing khimars at work.
The Circuit Court affirmed the federal district court?s decision granting GEO's motion for summary judgment dismissing EEOC?s complaint.
The district court had cited Webb v. City of Philadelphia, 562 F.3d 256,* in support of its ruling.
In Webb the US Circuit Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit, held that regardless of the sincere religious beliefs of certain police officer of the need to wear a khimar, their belief had to yield to the Philadelphia's police department's policy prohibiting the wearing of a khimar while on duty because "safety is undoubtedly an interest of the greatest importance."
* The Webb decision is posted on the Internet at http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/073081p.pdf
The GEO decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/093093p.pdf
.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on August 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Firestone Tire Problems Raise Questions of Safety
Are Your Car Tires Safe?
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Religious Decorations
Oklahoma City to pay attorney fees in religious freedom violations lawsuit.
Arkansas Nucor Plant Guilty of a Racially Hostile Work Environment
Nucor Guilty Of Racially Hostile Work Environment Must Pay $1.2 Million Settlement
Mutual Fund Losses
alleging financial advisors breached fiduciary duties by not looking out for investors best interests.
Environment Law
alleging damages from violation of the law.
Discrimination
race, gender, disability, religious or age discrimiation.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.

10th Circuit Upholds Drug Charges; Alleged Religious Beliefs Found Insincere
Videos Show Questioning Process In Immunization Waiver Application
"Arizona court: Drug laws trump religious use of marijuana."
Vaccination Objection Held To Be Sincere, But Not Religious
A Candidate's Policies Matter, Not Their Religious Beliefs
Alaska Appellate Court Says Religious Belief in Marijuana Was Not Sincere









