Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Judge finalizes jury for war-crimes case; A military judge seated a jury in the case of a Canadian accused of killing an American soldier when he was 15"

"Judge finalizes jury for war-crimes case; A military judge seated a jury in the case of a Canadian accused of killing an American soldier when he was 15": Carol Rosenberg has this article today in The Miami Herald.

The Toronto Globe and Mail today contains an article headlined "And then there were 7: The jury who will decide Omar Khadr's fate; U.S. military officers to weigh case against 23-year-old Canadian at Guantanamo."

The Toronto Star contains an article headlined "Captain critical of Gitmo to stay as Khadr jurors picked."

The New York Times reports that "Tour of Guantanamo Offers a Look, but Little Else."

CNN.com reports that "Military trial begins for Gitmo's youngest detainee."

Reuters has an article headlined "Keep or close Guantanamo? Military jurors weigh in."

MSNBC has reports headlined "Officer off Gitmo jury for agreeing with Obama; Prosecutors exclude juror for wanting to close the prison" and "Anyone for karaoke at Gitmo tonight?"

The Independent (UK) has a dispatch from Robert Verkaik headlined "Camp Delta's 'good kid' fights for a second chance."

The Toronto Sun has blog posts titled "Khadr jurors not voted off the island" and "For Omar Khadr, it's Maher Arar to the rescue."

And at "The Huffington Post," Maher Arar has an essay entitled "Why Is Canadian Child Soldier Omar Khadr Being Tried by a Military Court?"

Full post as published by How Appealing on August 12, 2010 (boomark / email).