ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> MediaShift Idea Lab

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: MediaShift Idea Lab

No returning to the all-elites era

By J.D. Lasica

ADVERTISEMENTS

In response to this week's Newsweek article Revenge of the Experts suggesting the expert is back and user-created content is on the wane, columnist Tom Regan offers this in today's Christian Science Monitor: Credible Web? It's where we click most. Expertise is essential online, but the Internet's real 'killer app' is choice. (Jay Rosen and I are quoted in the piece.)

An expert in the Newsweek article said, the world is "too dangerous a place for faulty information." People can deal with vetting information in two ways: rely solely on experts and authority figures. Or become a fact-checker, treating unverified information with skepticism and consulting multiple sources to get at the truth.

I've seen very little evidence that the sweeping cultural shifts we've seen in the past half dozen years show any signs of retreating. This is just a bit of wishful thinking on the part of traditional media folks. 

As Doc Searls likes to say, this is or thinking, when it should be about and thinking.  Experts and amateurs will continue to offer useful, reliable news and information.

Young, tech-savvy people in particular now typically rely on social networks that they've fashioned to take cues from their friends on which movies to see, books to read or vacation destinations to target. And didn't Lonely Planet Guide successfully explore this terrain for travel and Zagat's for dining back in the '90s?

The old guard will forever sniff at the likes of Wikipedia, but young people have learned to trust ourselves rather than relying exclusively on a caste of experts. Most of us are experts in one subject or another. The dissolution of information monopolies at the local level spells trouble for professional journalists at hundreds of U.S. newspapers that will vanish in the next decade.

Millions of cell phones now are capable of capturing fairly high-quality video. Just this week I learned of a new site, Qik, that will let any of these devices stream live video, further speeding the obsolescence of professional reporters on the scene of a news event.

Hardly a day goes by that I don't receive an email from a newspaper reporter asking for job leads in the tech startup world. That doesn't bode well for the cult of the expert.

To be sure, too many readers are still too credulous about what appears on the Internet. (The latest video hit piece on Barack Obama making the rounds is testament to that.) We need to fine-tune our B.S. meters and do a better job in figuring out that not all sources are created equal. 

In the end, Web 3.0 will not be about turning back the clock to the era of elites and experts. It will be about making this hyperconnected  global social network more relevant to our lives.

Full post as published by MediaShift Idea Lab on March 19, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0143 secs (new cache)