Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogSamaha on FCC v. Pacifica
By Lawrence Solum
ADVERTISEMENTS
Adam Samaha (University of Chicago - Law School) has posted The Story of FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (And Its Second Life) (FIRST AMENDMENT STORIES, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, eds., Foundation Press, 2010) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:-
This chapter provides a back story to FCC v. Pacifica Foundation ? the so-called seven dirty words case, which upheld the Commission?s authority to regulate broadcast indecency. The history of broadcast indecency regulation is briefly reviewed, along with the emergence of countercultural radio in the 1960s and 1970s. The chapter then turns to George Carlin and his personal transformation, Pacifica radio and its turbulent times, and the complaint of a Morality in Media board member that instigated FCC proceedings. The litigation history of the case is likewise investigated. This research provides insight into why the Department of Justice switched sides when the case reached the Supreme Court, and it identifies Justice Stevens as the likely swing voter. Apparently he was wrestling with issues of statutory interpretation. The chapter includes new interviews with several participants in the controversy, as well as some original archival research. The chapter closes with a few thoughts on the path of indecency regulation since the Pacifica case. It points up the relationship between constraint and creativity; and it suggests that technological change making the broadcast medium less important also makes broadcast regulation less problematic. The ?just change the channel? argument, so rhetorically effective against indecency regulation in the past, is now switching sides.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on August 19, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Audio: Adam Samaha, "Muskets and Glocks: The Second Amendment Reborn"
9th Circuit: Substantive Due Process in Land Use Cases (Armendariz is Still Dead)
Second Circuit strikes down FCC expletive policy
Justice Thomas Expresses Disagreement with Red Lion and Pacifica,
"My name is a footnote in American legal history...








