Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bailout Blogs -> Calculated Risk

Bailout

: Calculated Risk

Waldman on meeting of Bloggers and Treasury Officials

By Anonymous

Steve Randy Waldman at Interfluidity writes about a discussion last week with several bloggers and Treasury officials: Monday at the Treasury: an overlong exegesis

A few excerpts:

Obviously the headline act was Timothy Geithner. Off the record (or ?on deep background?), Geithner is entirely different from the sometimes stiff character who appears on television. He is fun to argue with, very smart, good natured, and intellectually wily. As Yves Smith quipped afterwards, Geithner ?gives good meeting.?

Despite that, our seminar was an adversarial affair.

And on HAMP:

On HAMP, officials were surprisingly candid. The program has gotten a lot of bad press in terms of its Kafka-esque qualification process and its limited success in generating mortgage modifications under which families become able and willing to pay their debt. Officials pointed out that what may have been an agonizing process for individuals was a useful palliative for the system as a whole. Even if most HAMP applicants ultimately default, the program prevented an outbreak of foreclosures exactly when the system could have handled it least. There were murmurs among the bloggers of ?extend and pretend?, but I don?t think that?s quite right. This was extend-and-don?t-even-bother-to-pretend. The program was successful in the sense that it kept the patient alive until it had begun to heal. And the patient of this metaphor was not a struggling homeowner, but the financial system, a.k.a. the banks. Policymakers openly judged HAMP to be a qualified success because it helped banks muddle through what might have been a fatal shock. I believe these policymakers conflate, in full sincerity, incumbent financial institutions with ?the system?, ?the economy?, and ?ordinary Americans?. Treasury officials are not cruel people. I?m sure they would have preferred if the program had worked out better for homeowners as well. But they have larger concerns, and from their perspective, HAMP has helped to address those.

If correct, HAMP was mostly a foreclosure delaying program.

There is much more in the post from Waldman.

Full post as published by Calculated Risk on August 23, 2010 (boomark / email).