ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

When appealing individual?s employment status all parties that may be affected must be named and served

ADVERTISEMENTS
When appealing individual?s employment status all parties that may be affected must be named and served
Five Residents v Liberty CSD, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision #13861

If a party wishes to have the Commissioner of Education review an issue, it is critical that all parties who might be affected by the Commissioner?s decision be named in the petition. This point was made clear in an appeal filed by five residents of the Liberty Central School District.

A five-year employment contract between Superintendent and the District was to terminate June 30. Prior to June 30, the parties signed a new contract providing for the Superintendents employment for an additional two years.

The resident-appellants challenged the extension of the contract, claiming it violated the ?minimum/maximum? term provisions set out in Section 1711(3) of the Education Law.*

The Commissioner dismissed the petition without considering its merits. He commented that the residents had failed to name a necessary party -- the District?s Board of Education. The Commissioner said that ?since the board?s agreement with the superintendent would be adversely affected by a decision in favor of the [residents], the board is a necessary party to this appeal.?**

* Section 1711(3) provides, in pertinent part: ?a board of education may enter into a contract with such superintendent for a period of not less than three and not more than five years,?

** In addition, the Commissioner said that he would have had dismiss the appeal event if the board had been named in the petition as the issue had become moot as a result of the Superintendent?s having resigned and thus the contract that the residents sought to have annulled was no longer in effect.
.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on August 30, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/05/26 03:51:29)