Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bailout Blogs -> Macroprudential
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bailout
: MacroprudentialGreece: The bull case
By Felix Salmon
Back in April, I noted with respect to Greece that “the bear case is terrifying, and the bull case is very hard to articulate”. So it’s extremely useful to have a clearly-articulated paper from the IMF, entitled “Default in Today?s Advanced Economies: Unnecessary, Undesirable, and Unlikely”, which puts the bull case much more vividly than I’ve seen it before.
At its heart is this table:

The idea here is that whether or not you default, you’re going to have to embark upon a large fiscal adjustment in order to get back into sustainable territory. And even if you default with a massive 50% haircut, the size of that fiscal adjustment doesn’t change all that much:
The needed adjustment in today?s advanced economies would not be much affected by debt restructuring, even with a sizable haircut. To be concrete, let us consider by how much the primary adjustment needed to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio could be reduced by applying a 50 percent haircut?exceptionally large by historical standards. The haircut would make a limited difference for the required primary fiscal balance adjustment: 0.5 percentage point of GDP on average, and 2.7 percentage points for Greece. In percent of the adjustment in the absence of haircut, the reduction in the needed adjustment would be less than one-tenth on average and less than one-fifth in the case of Greece.
That’s the “unnecessary” part of the headline; the “undesirable” is pretty self-explanatory. But as for “unlikely”, I’m not convinced. Here’s the paper:
The essence of our reasoning is that the challenge stems mainly from the advanced economies? large primary deficits, not from a high average interest rate on debt. Thus, default would not significantly reduce the need for major fiscal adjustment. In contrast, the economies that defaulted in recent decades did so primarily as a result of high debt servicing costs, often in the context of major external shocks. We conclude that default would not be in the interest of the citizens of the countries in question. Fiscal adjustment supported by reforms that enhance economic growth is a more effective response.
Well, yes, we’d all like fiscal adjustment and structural reforms, and probably a pony to boot. But in the case of Greece, and probably other countries too, it ain’t gonna happen. Which is why they’re going to default.
(HT: Alea)
Full post as published by Macroprudential on September 01, 2010 (boomark / email).
N.Y. Nightclub Owner
Settlement reached Red Bull Energy Drink lawsuit.
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis

Olympic Airways, State Aid, Infringements and Financial Penalites against Greece: Case C-369/07
John Mauldin: The same market forces that work in Illinois can work in Greece
NY: Greece prayer case goes to court
More Troubles for Greece, harbinger of things to come
The Greek crisis and the future of the euro zone
Greece Sues Monastery Over Land Exchange, Seeks $12 Million, Ownership








