Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> IP Dragon
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: IP DragonWorkTools: "We Won the Judgement But it Did No Good" Part II
Mr Brad I Golstein wrote:
"In this particular instance in Taiwan, the case dragged on so long that the applicable law changed before it was decided, so the court threw out the case as being moot (irrelevant) in light of the changed law. It is the strong suspicion of many that Taiwan laws are designed more to protect home industry than to protect intellectual property rights. In general, the "proof" requirements are much greater and the penalties for infringement are much less than in the United States. What is often recommended to achieve success is that the foreign company have a Taiwanese partner who is the actual party to the lawsuit (such as the company that has the official rights to manufacture the product in Taiwan)--that makes it a case of Taiwan company vs Taiwan company rather than Taiwan company vs Foreign company. Larger Taiwan companies are probably more likely to respect IP rights, and less likely to simply close up the offending shop and just open anew down the street (although this is still possible)."
"Success" in stopping Asian knock-offs is a relative term--many times that means driving the infringer underground rather than being able to> eliminate them entirely. Many times it means getting major retailers to agree to not stock the offending product rather than actually stopping the manufacture of it. And while some degree of success> might be achieved in North America and Western Europe, it is much harder in less regulated parts of the globe, such as Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, etc. Heck, even mega-corporations such as Disney, Levi's, Microsoft, etc. have their hands full and cannot stop all the infringers. "
"As a bit of an elaboration, the penalties for infringement in Taiwan in the matter we were pursuing before it was dismissed were quiteminor--something like putting a notice in the local paper and a fine of$4,000 (which the government would keep, it would not go to us tocompensate for our losses!)."
Brad I Golstein WorkTools, Inc.
Full post as published by IP Dragon on March 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Apeks Scuba Diving Regulator
Recalled Due To Missing Part
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Tyson Foods
Donates Chickens as Part of Class Action Settlement
Asbestos Cleanup
Penn. Electric Co. pays part of $77,498 settlement in environmental lawsuit.
Energy Price Gouging
Inergy Propane announces refunds to customers as part of lawsuit settlement.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

In Responding To Summary Judgement Motion Specific Facts Must Be Alleged
CCU: Banks' Motion for Summary Judgement in Texas
Properly Understanding the Relationship Between the BJR and CSR
In court today: Judgement expected in Dwain Chambers' Olympic bid







