Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesGeneric Particulars
By Philip Brooks
From today's (March 21, 2008) The Indian Express, comes this editorial:
From January 2005, a new law was to have brought India into compliance with the WTO on how pharmaceutical products were to be patented. Earlier, patent protection was offered on the process; now the product itself was sought to be protected by patent. This meant that a drug could no longer be reverse engineered and marketed. However, as a case that came in for an interim order in the Delhi high court on Wednesday shows, the new patent regime still has many grey zones which need to be addressed before the public policy implications can be adequately assessed. The court refused to stay drug-maker Cipla from manufacturing and selling a lung cancer formulation which the Swiss company, Roche, says is being done in violation of its patent. The case comes in for hearing again in August. Positions have predictably been taken by activists and pharma players, but the issues raised go beyond the specifics of the Cipla/Roche case.
Read the full editorial here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on March 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
ETHEX Corp
5 Generic Drugs Recalled Due to Risk of Death From Overdose
Generic Versions
Barr Pharmaceuticals to pay $5.9 million settlement for blocking the sale of oral contraceptives.

FTC Sues Cephalon for Blocking Entry of Generic Provigil
Wyeth undercuts Teva on Protonix
FTC Report on Generic and Branded Drug Manufacturer Settlements
Pill Manufacturing Oversight Recalls Actavis Generic Drugs
Companies (Particulars of Company Charges) Regulations 2008








