Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> 43(B)log
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: 43(B)logVariances in attribution norms
By Rebecca Tushnet
ADVERTISEMENTS
The New York Times on a controversy over whether a recent article was properly credited. Of note: (1) The author denies even reading the allegedly similarly structured pieces, but the article proceeds mostly as if he did, or might have. (2) The similarities are pretty clearly what copyright calls scenes a faire; the question is whether norms of attribution were violated, not copyright. But the author's defenders argue that such norms were not violated because the topics are scenes a faire, such that any treatment of the subject--the effect of linguistic differences on thought--would cover the same ground. (3) The norms of scholarship are not the norms of journalism; journalists treat citation as minimally required for aesthetic reasons. Should aesthetics weigh against attribution in this way, as Zahr Stauffer argues it should weigh against disclosure of commercial sponsorship in many cases? (Aesthetic here means readability, but then don't aesthetic claims often really mean "not as many people will like/watch this if I do it differently?) (4) The article concludes that web versions of articles can do better in giving credit--which in this specific case would bring us back to question (1), whether the author had read the other scholar's work.HT: Francesca Coppa.
Full post as published by 43(B)log on October 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Delta and Pine Land Co.
$300,000 settlement in SEC norms violation lawsuit.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Variances Upheld as Board Applied Statutory Balancing Test
Zoning Board Members May Rely on Personal Knowledge When Considering Area Variances
Norms, the look and feel of a law department
Zoning Boards Denial of Area Variances Upheld as Rational and Supported by Evidence in the Record
Wind farm law amended to allow for variances (The Buffalo News)








