Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Disciplinary arbitration award is not reviewable by PERB even if alleged to constitute an improper practice within the meaning of the Taylor Law

Disciplinary arbitration award is not reviewable by PERB even if alleged to constitute an improper practice within the meaning of the Taylor Law
Toshunbe and Buffalo Board of Education, 32 PERB 3026

Doris Toshunbe was served with disciplinary charges alleging 21 counts of incompetence, 12 counts of insubordination and 11 counts of misconduct. The arbitrator, ?apparently ... based on the disciplinary charges before him ... found that Toshunbe was ?stubborn, abstinent [sic] and lack [sic] respect for authority.?? He ordered that Toshunbe be suspended for two weeks without pay, which the district could deem ?a progressive disciplinary action.?

Toshunbe challenged the arbitrator?s decision by filed an improper practice charge with PERB, alleging ?improper motivation? by the district. After discussing a number of the procedural issues concerning timeliness, PERB rejected her petition on the basis of ?lack of jurisdiction.?

PERB said that ?review of an arbitrator?s award is not available in an improper practice proceeding against an employer ... review of that award is available under Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR] Article 75.?

Explaining that ?to avoid our becoming a substitute for or an alternative to the statutory review procedures, a CPLR proceeding should be the preferred mechanism for the review, modification or vacatur of disciplinary arbitration awards, absent extraordinary circumstances,? PERB sustained the Director of Public Employment Practices and Representation?s determination.
.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on October 21, 2010 (boomark / email).