Academic

BLOGS AND WEB-MAGAZINES: A Grand Convergence? I remember back when Slate called blogs ?Me-Zines.? ?

By Glenn Reynolds

BLOGS AND WEB-MAGAZINES: A Grand Convergence? I remember back when Slate called blogs “Me-Zines.” I like what James Lileks said back when blogs were new:

A wire story consists of one voice pitched low and calm and full of institutional gravitas, blissfully unaware of its own biases or the gaping lacunae in its knowledge. Whereas blogs have a different format: Clever teaser headline that has little to do with the actual story, but sets the tone for this blog post. Breezy ad hominem slur containing the link to the entire story. Excerpt of said story, demonstrating its idiocy (or brilliance) Blogauthor?s remarks, varying from dismissive sniffs to a Tolstoi- length rebuttal. Seven comments from people piling on, disagreeing, adding a link, acting stupid, preaching to the choir, accusing choir of being Nazis, etc.

I?d say it?s a throwback to the old newspapers, the days when partisan slants covered everything from the play story to the radio listings, but this is different. The link changes everything. When someone derides or exalts a piece, the link lets you examine the thing itself without interference. TV can?t do that. Radio can?t do that. Newspapers and magazines don?t have the space. My time on the internet resembles eight hours at a coffeeshop stocked with every periodical in the world ? if someone says ?I read something stupid? or ?there was this wonderful piece in the Atlantic? then conversation stops while you read the piece and make up your own mind.

Still the best distinction between trad-media and blogs, I think.

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on October 23, 2010 (boomark / email).