Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Slaw.caE-Discovery and the Auto-Deletion of Emails
By John Gregory
Some email programs automatically delete old emails after a fixed time. Most come with a function that allows the owner of the system to set up a time after which old emails are automatically deleted (unless they have been moved to particular storage folders, probably). This function seems useful to avoid clutter. It?s like a record destruction schedule.
Is there a standard time at which such auto-delete functions should be set, or should there be? What?s a safe time, legally as well as practically? It is clear enough that without such a function, some people (most?) would never get around to deleting their old emails, and the system would require a lot of storage. Is the setting up of an auto-delete system any different from setting up a record destruction schedule for any other record, paper or electronic?
What happens when an operation (business or government) runs into a situation of probable or actual litigation, such that the principles of (electronic) discovery would require a ?litigation hold? on relevant records? Should auto-delete on the email system be turned off? Is there a way of turning such functions off for particular users or particular subjects? (My office mail now deletes my Sent Mail after two months ? a practice instituted perhaps a year ago without any notice to users so far as I know) ? but does not delete my Inbox ever.)
Is this any different from instructing the record managers (assuming a big enough organization that such people exist) to hold off from destroying other records on the normal schedule for the same reasons?
Do you know of a good guide to such practices, beyond the general level of the Sedona Principles? Would the best practices vary according to the limitation periods of the relevant jurisdictions? I can?t think of a reason to distinguish emails from any other records, except for the automation feature on their deletion, which is a practical hazard not a justification for a legal difference.
What do you advise?
Full post as published by Slaw.ca on October 24, 2010 (boomark / email).
Manasek Auto Parts
allegedly conspiring to fix prices for replacement oil, air, fuel and transmission filters.
Dana Tax Donations
Bankrupt auto supplier pays $1.25 million settlement.
US Auto
Meeting Notification Regarding $10 Million Class Action Settlement.
Bad Faith Estimate
Quality First Auto Glass pays $233,000 settlement in automotive lawsuit.
Gas Tank Explosions
Ford agrees to settlement in auto safety class action lawsuit.
Auto Financing
Credit Acceptance Corp. agrees to $52.1 million class action settlement after overcharging consumers for fees and interest on automobile installment contracts.

No spoliation sanctions for deletion of email where CD copies had been made
Amazon Sued by Students Over Remote Deletion of Orwell's '1984'
"Do Your Emails Have the Correct Tone"








